Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av peejay
Idioterna på polisen har förmodligen bättre koll än random forum-idiot.
Eftersom GolfnBet har seglat utan både spellicens och F-skattesedel så har det helt enkelt handlat om att du satt in pengar på Stefan Gladhs konto. Således står det mellan er två, vilket då naturligt faller in under "civilrättslig karaktär"
|
I guessed they couldn't be bothered with me because I was English. I was an idiot to deposit (Google translate says you think I'm an idiot), but that doesn't mean that the Swedish police can ignore a crime. What have the Swedish players been told by the police?
Surely it is a criminal offence: theft - obtaining property by deception. To say it is a civil matter assumes it is a simple debt, but it's not. English law has both the general crime of theft, and the specific crime of obtaining property by deception, which is aimed just at this type of "con man" scenario. Does the same not exist in Swedish law?
To give an easy example: what would happen to the person who faked someone's signature on a stolen credit card to buy an expensive TV in a shop? In English law, that would be obtaining property by deception; would it not be a crime in Sweden?